<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to encrypt your email using freenigma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/08/26/how-to-encrypt-your-email-using-freenigma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/08/26/how-to-encrypt-your-email-using-freenigma/</link>
	<description>Common questions, simple answers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:55:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lefty Penny</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/08/26/how-to-encrypt-your-email-using-freenigma/comment-page-1/#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>Lefty Penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 02:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/08/26/how-to-encrypt-your-email-using-freenigma/#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>I like the looks of this software but, I would like to know how a version was developed for firefox, probably less than 10% of the potential. Why wouldn&#039;t you have gone with the majority of potential using IE.

Lefty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the looks of this software but, I would like to know how a version was developed for firefox, probably less than 10% of the potential. Why wouldn&#8217;t you have gone with the majority of potential using IE.</p>
<p>Lefty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
