Hello fellow Digger , if you like this page, don't forget to digg it !您好研究員挖掘機 ,如果你喜歡這個網頁,不要忘記digg !
Love it or hate it, Finder is the default file manager for OS X. But there are other choices out there, and this article offers reviews, screenshots and links to download 10 different alternatives.愛它,要么恨它,查找是預設的檔案管理員為OS X的,但還有其他的選擇,在那裡,和本文提供了評語,畫面和鏈接,下載了10種不同的選擇。
Did I miss your favorite file manager in this list?我懷念您最喜愛的檔案管理員在這份名單呢? By all means please feel free to leave a comment below and I’ll update this list (come on - the採取一切手段,請隨時留下意見下面,我將更新這份名單(來就- windows commenters在Windows提意見 have suggested a lot!)曾建議了很多! )
| Name名字 | Cost (USD)成本(美元) | Demo version available演示版本 | Universal Binary通用二進制 | Stars (out of 5)星級(出5 ) | Detailed review詳細檢討 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Path Finder路徑查找 | $34.95 $ 34.95 | yes (21 days)是( 21天) | yes是 | ***½ ***半 | here這裡 |
| Disk Order磁盤秩序 | $22.57 22.57美元 | yes (30 days)是( 30天) | yes是 | *** | here這裡 |
| FileBrowse filebrowse | $25.00 $ 25.00 | yes (30 days)是( 30天) | yes是 | **** | here這裡 |
| FileRun filerun | $??.?? | no否 | unknown未知 | n/a n /一 | here這裡 |
| 3DOSX 3dosx | free自由的 | n/a n /一 | no否 | ** | here這裡 |
| RAGE Macintosh Explorer憤怒的Macintosh總管 | $15.95 $ 15.95 | yes是 | not yet, but works w/ Rosetta還沒有,但工程瓦特/羅塞塔 | **½ ** ½ | here這裡 |
| Xfolders xfolders | free自由的 | n/a n /一 | yes是 | **** | here這裡 |
| muCommander mucommander | free自由的 | n/a n /一 | no否 | **** | here這裡 |
| Liquifile liquifile | $9.90 $ 9.90 | yes (30 days)是( 30天) | yes是 | **½ ** ½ | here這裡 |
| Xfile xfile | $79.00 $ 79.00 | no否 | no否 | * | here這裡 |
Requirements: Version 4.5 requires Mac OS X 10.4 or higher, there is an older version available for 10.3 and 10.2, however that version will no longer be updated. 要求:版本4.5需要Mac OS X 10.4或更高版本,有一個舊的版本,供10.3和10.2 ,不過這個版本將不再更新。
Download URL: 下載網址: http://www.cocoatech.com/download.php
Features in a nutshell: 在功能簡單地說就是:
New Features:新的特點:
Thoughts: 思考:
Path Finder is by far the most “popular” alternative to Finder for OS X. It has many, many features that you won’t find in Finder (top of the list would be tabs, desktop icon changes and the ‘drop stack’).路徑搜索是目前為止最“熱門”替代尋OS X上也有很多,很多的功能,您將無法找到在Finder (清單的最上方,將製表符,桌面圖標的變化和'下拉棧' ) 。 The Path Finder menu item/button is also a helpful feature (see image below).路徑Finder選單項目/按鈕也是一個有用的功能(見下面的圖片) 。
It uses more system resources than most of the other File Managers outlined in this article, and isn’t above the occasional crash.它使用更多的系統資源比其他大部分的檔案管理概述在這篇文章中,並沒有上述偶爾崩潰。 It does share the same “3 view” option as Finder (list, columns, icons), but the addition of tabs helps make for a far less cluttered desktop.它共享相同的“三觀”的方案,查找(名單,列,圖示) ,但此外的標籤有助於使一個遠不及凌亂的桌面上。
Being the 2nd most expensive File Manager reviewed, it’sa good thing that there’sa 21 day fully-functional demo available.作為第二最昂貴的檔案管理員審查,這是一件好事有21天全功能演示。
Screenshots: 畫面:
Requirements: OSX 10.3 and higher, there is an older version for 10.2 that won’t be updated and has fewer features 要求: OSX版10.3及更高版本,有一個舊的版本為10.2指出,將不會更新,並已較少的功能
Download URL: 下載網址: http://www.likemac.ru/english/download.shtml
Features in a nutshell: 在功能簡單地說就是:
Thoughts: 思考:
Disk Order is pretty nice.磁盤秩序,是相當不錯。 The built in FTP client is helpful, the built-in preview works well and mix of Mac native and Norton-Commander styles blend really well.在內置的FTP客戶端是有益的,內置在預覽運作良好,並能組合的Mac本土和Norton -指揮官風格融合真的好。 Its biggest drawback is that其最大的缺點是 Xfolders xfolders is very similar, but free. 非常相似,但免費的。
Screenshots: 畫面:
Requirements: Mac OS X 10.4.0 and later 要求:在Mac OS X 10.4.0及更高版本
Download URL: 下載網址: http://www.filebrowse.com/download.html
Features in a nutshell: 在功能簡單地說就是:
Thoughts: 思考:
FileBrowse strikes me as a ‘love it or hate it’ File Manager. filebrowse罷工,我作為一個'愛它,要么恨它'檔案管理員。 It’s quite different than the others in this list, as it has far fewer features.這是相當不同的比別人在此清單中,因為它少得多的特點。 But… what it lacks in features, it makes up for by perfecting the the existing ones. … …什麼,但它缺乏在功能,它彌補了完善現有的。 Plus, at the (early) version of 1.0.2, who knows what the future may have in store.另外,在(初)版本1.0.2 ,誰知道什麼未來可能有在商店。
Arguably the best ‘feature’ of FileBrowse is its unique, minimalist but elegant interface.可以說是最好的'功能' filebrowse是其獨特的,最低限度的,但優雅的界面。 FileBrowse can show thumbnails for many file types, not only for images. filebrowse可以顯示縮略圖許多文件類型,不僅為圖像。 And folder icons even show the items inside, so you don’t have to open a folder to see its contents.和文件夾圖標,甚至顯示的項目內,因此,您不必打開一個文件夾,查看其內容。 Keyboard navigation within FileBrowse takes some getting used to.鍵盤導航內部filebrowse需要一些習慣。 Previewing images at different sizes is a snap, and previewing multimedia (music, movies) is just as easy.預覽圖像在大小不同的是一個管理單元,並預覽多媒體(音樂,電影)一樣簡單。 Give it a try, but don’t blame me if you don’t like it.給它一個嘗試,但不要責怪我,如果你不喜歡它。
Screenshots: 畫面:
![]() FileBrowse is pretty filebrowse是相當 | ![]() FileBrowse is pretty 2 filebrowse是漂亮的2 |
![]() view the contents of folders查看文件夾的內容 | ![]() huge preview龐大的預覽 |
![]() play, preview or open media發揮,預覽或打開媒體 |
Requirements: who knows, it’s not out yet 要求:誰知道,這還沒有
Download URL: n/a - but the home page is: 下載網址:無/一-,但主頁是: http://www.filerun.info/
Features in a nutshell: 在功能簡單地說就是:
Thoughts: 思考:
I really only included this one because I’ve been watching this website for updates since Jan of 2006.我真的只包括一本,因為我一直在看這個網站的更新,自2006年1月。 It was supposed to be available for download in Feb of 2006, and still isn’t.這是假定,以供下載,在2006年2月,現在仍然是沒有。 It’sa shame, because it looks like it could be really great.這是恥辱,因為它看起來好像可以真正的偉大。
Screenshots: 畫面:
![]() FileRun - doesn’t exist, but looks pretty filerun -不存在,但外觀也相當漂亮 | ![]() FileRun filerun |
![]() FileRun again filerun再次 | ![]() FileRun LastOne filerun lastone |
Requirements: Mac OS X 10.1 or higher, and an OpenGL hardware accelerated video card (supporting OpenGL 1.2 or higher) 要求:在Mac OS X 10.1或更高, 1 OpenGL的硬件加速視頻卡(支持OpenGL的1.2或更高)
Download URL: 下載網址: http://www.acm.uiuc.edu/macwarriors/projects/oldprojects/3dosx/download.html
Features in a nutshell: 在功能簡單地說就是:
Thoughts: 思考:
Barely worked for me.勉強工作了我。 A neat concept that was either very poorly executed, or not at all intended for a MacBook Pro and/or Tiger.整潔的概念,這是不是很差執行,或者沒有在所有打算為一的MacBook Pro和/或老虎。 It reminded me a bit of它提醒我,有點 Sphere領域 , but I used Sphere for at least an hour longer than I did 3DOSX. ,但我用領域的至少一個小時的時間比我3dosx 。
Screenshots: 畫面:
![]() 3DOSX is a neat concept 3dosx是一個乾淨的概念 | ![]() Too bad it doesn’t really work (for me)太差,並沒有真正的工作(我) |
![]() 3DOSX prefs 3dosx偏好設定 | ![]() 3DOSX apps view 3dosx應用服務的意見 |
RAGE Macintosh Explorer憤怒的Macintosh總管
Requirements: OS X, OS 9 要求: OS X中, OS 9的
Download URL: 下載網址: http://www.ragesw.com/products/explorer/download/
Features in a nutshell: 在功能簡單地說就是:
Thoughts: 思考:
As the name suggests, Macintosh Explorer is what might happen if Finder and Windows Explorer had an ugly child.作為顧名思義,在Macintosh Explorer是什麼可能發生的,如果Finder和Windows檔案總管了難看的兒童。 OK not ugly, but not very exciting either.確定沒有醜陋的,但不是非常激動人心。 At least it has tabs.至少它的標籤。 It responded quite slowly compared to the other File Managers.它的反應相當緩慢,相比其他檔案管理人員。
The Filter drawer was the best feature I found.過濾器抽屜裡是最好的功能,我發現。 It allows you to create and save filters so with one click you can find the files you’re looking for in a given folder.它允許你創建和保存過濾器,以便與一按,您可以找到文件您正在尋找在一個特定的文件夾中。
Screenshots: 畫面:
Requirements: Apple PowerPC or Intel based Mac with Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger 要求:蘋果PowerPC或基於Intel的Mac與Mac OS X 10.4老虎
Download URL: 下載網址: http://www.kai-heitkamp.de/cms_en/main.php?content… http://www.kai-heitkamp.de/cms_en/main.php?content …
Features in a nutshell: 在功能簡單地說就是:
Thoughts: 思考:
Xfolders is one of the three reviewed File Managers that I haven’t yet removed from my Mac. xfolders就是其中的3審查檔案管理,我還沒有拆除,從我的Mac 。 It’s very easy to navigate using just the Keyboard, and all mouse actions are exactly as you’d expect.它很容易瀏覽只用鍵盤,鼠標和所有的行動,正是您預期的那樣好。 If you’re a fan of the Norton Commander style of File Manager, you’ll appreciate the Xfolders layout (though maybe not as much as如果您是一位球迷的Norton指揮官的作風,檔案管理員,您將欣賞xfolders佈局(雖然也許不是高達 muCommander mucommander ). ) 。
Compared to all of the other File Managers, Xfolders uses a very small amount of system resources.相比所有其他檔案管理, xfolders使用一個非常少量的系統資源。 The ability to completely customize the Toolbar is a nice bonus.的能力,完全自定義工具欄是一個很好的獎金。
Screenshots: 畫面:
![]() Default Xfolders view默認xfolders的看法 | ![]() Xfolders Spotlight add-on xfolders聚光燈下添加對 |
![]() customize Xfolders toolbar自定義工具欄xfolders | ![]() Xfolders new folder xfolders新文件夾 |
![]() Xfolders prefs xfolders偏好設定 |
Requirements: Mac OS X 10.1 and up 要求: Mac OS X 10.1中和了
Download URL: 下載網址: http://www.mucommander.com/#download http://www.mucommander.com/ #下載
Features in a nutshell: 在功能簡單地說就是:
Thoughts: 思考:
muCommander is a Norton Commander-lovers dream come true for OS X. Also, being cross-platform, you can use this File Manager on multiple OS’s (if you’re that kind of person). mucommander是一個諾頓指揮官愛好者夢想成真為OS X的同時,正在跨平台,您可以使用這個檔案管理員對多個操作系統的(如果您認為種人) 。 Supporting FTP, SFTP and HTTP is great (HTTP is a very neat feature).支持的FTP , SFTP發布和HTTP是偉大的( HTTP是一種非常整齊功能) 。 Smallest system resource footprint of all the tested File Managers.最小的系統資源佔用的所有測試檔案管理人員。
Screenshots: 畫面:
Requirements: OS 10.4 or higher 要求: OS 10.4或更高
Download URL: 下載網址: http://www.liquefile.com/ (then click the download link) (然後單擊下載鏈接)
Features in a nutshell: 在功能簡單地說就是:
Even the folks at liquifile.com seem to have trouble explaining their product.即使是鄉親在liquifile.com似乎有麻煩,解釋他們的產品。 They suggest you watch他們建議您觀賞 this video這部影片 (in German) to understand its features. (在德國) ,以了解它的功能。 Liquifile is based on some concepts and technologies (like liquifile是基於一些概念和技術(如 liquid browsing液體瀏覽 or the scatter tree) that originate from the “iworld” or “infoverse” project.或散射樹)源於“ iworld ”或“ infoverse ”項目。
Thoughts: 思考:
It’s neat.它的乾淨。 I guess.我猜想。 I won’t be using it any time soon, but I suppose there are folks out there who might adore this File Manager.我不會用它任何時候很快,但我有鄉親有可能崇拜誰,這檔案管理員。 Give it a try, it’s unique at least.給它一個嘗試,它的獨特至少。
Screenshots: 畫面:
![]() use the far right slider to adjust size使用極右派滑桿,調整大小 | ![]() some file options一些檔案選項 |
![]() bubble size and location matters氣泡的大小和位置事項 | ![]() folder view文件夾視圖 |
![]() Liquifile prefs liquifile偏好設定 |
Requirements: OS X, I think. 要求: OS X的,我覺得。
Download URL: 下載網址: http://rixstep.com/4/0/buy/index.shtml
Features in a nutshell: 在功能簡單地說就是:
Thoughts: 思考:
Seriously, $79 for a single license and there’s no demo/trial?嚴重的是, 79元為一個單一的許可證,並沒有演示/審判? We’re supposed to decide if we want to buy this software based on just three screenshots?我們以為我們已經作出決定,如果我們要購買這一軟件的基礎上只有三個畫面? Get real.獲得真實的。 I’m not sure that it deserves even one star, but I like the idea of a 40 KB executable.我不能肯定,值得甚至一星,但我喜歡這種想法的一個40或可執行文件。
Screenshots: 畫面:
![]() Xfile looks pretty nice xfile外觀也相當漂亮尼斯 | ![]() uh ok嗯確定 |
![]() delete stuff刪除的東西 |



































































{ 18 trackbacks } ( 18 trackbacks )
{ 34 comments } ( 34評論)
That Liquifile is not in Italian :/這liquifile是不是在意大利: /
Then, After seeing all those … I should love my normal Finder … it is far better ..然後,在看到所有這些… …我要熱愛我的正常查找… …這是好得多..
Running any of those will just take up more ram on your system.運行任何這些只是採取了更多的RAM在您的系統上。 Anyway, the best File browser is built write into OS X… No it’s not the Finder.不過,無論如何,最好的文件瀏覽器是建立在寫進OS X的…沒有這不是查找。 Its the Terminal.它的終端。
KodeK, kodek ,
Correct - the movie that shows the Liquifile features is in Italian.正確的-影片顯示l iquifile的特點是在意大利。
Your comment on Xfile is a bit unfair:您的評論對xfile是有點不公平:
Seriously, $79 for a single license and there’s no demo/trial?嚴重的是, 79元為一個單一的許可證,並沒有演示/審判?
For those 79 damn dollars you get a lot more than Xfile alone.對於那些可惡的79美元,你得到了很多以上xfile單。 Xfile is part of a much larger package. xfile的一部分,一個更大的方案。 Some of it is great stuff.一些,這是偉大的東西。 See for yourself at:看到自己在:
That’sa great list, Xfolders really deserves the 4 stars you gave it. that'sa大名單, xfolders真不愧為4星級你給它。
Can someone please make me a spatial finder?有人可以請讓我一個空間查找呢? PLEASE??!!請嗎? !
Liquifile seems a bit out of place since it’s menat to be used on a handheld device or at least a device with pressure-sensitive display/tablet. liquifile似乎有點失控的地方,因為它的默納可用於手持設備,或者至少是設備與壓力敏感的顯示/片。
1. 1 。 I have been using Pathfinder for the last 6+ months and find it [now] indispensable.我一直使用探路者,為過去6個月+並找到它[現在]是不可缺少的。
2. 2 。 In the beginning of my trial of Pathfinder, I found that I just did not “get it”.在開始時我的審判探路者,我發現我剛才沒有“得到它” 。 It took me at least a month to really appreciate it.我花了至少一個月,要真正欣賞它。
3. 3 。 I found that the 21-day demo clock behaves strangely.我發現了為期21天的演示時鐘的表現很奇怪。 For me, it was about a 45-day demo and I still had time left.對我來說,這是約45天的演示和我仍然有時間離開。
@ross: KodeK is right, ross. @羅斯: kodek是正確的,羅斯。 the Liquifile movie is not in italian.該liquifile電影是不是在意大利。 it is german.這是德國。 (i know it, because i took it (我知道它,因為我把它
@all: …sorry for the bad quality by the way. @所有: … …對不起,壞質量的方式。 there will be a new one soon that is also in english.會有一個新的盡快也就是在英語。 for all of you who want to know more about Liquifile in english: read the readme.所有誰,你想知道更多關於liquifile在英語:閱讀自述文件。 we are working on better documentaion right now.我們的工作更好地documentaion的權利。
@ross: can you provide a link to the new movie, when it is done? @羅斯:你能否提供一個可連接至新電影,當它做什麼? i think that could be a great help since it is not very easy to understand Liquifile without it.我認為這可能是一個很大的幫助,因為它並不是很容易的了解liquifile沒有它。
@graham: what is your ultimate “spatial finder”? @格雷厄姆:什麼是您最終的“空間查找”呢? can you describe it?你能形容它呢? that could be a help to understand you better….and it could be very interesing…可以幫助我們了解您更好的… … 。它可以很interesing …
Carsten - carsten -
I got your note via email - I’ve changed the info to state the movie is in German (how did I get it into my head that it was Italian??) I would be more than happy to update w/ a link to the english movie as soon as it’s ready, and update the review w/ the next version of Liquifile as well.我得到您的注意,透過電子郵件-我已經改變了信息,以國家的電影是在德國(怎麼我得到它變成我的頭,這是意大利? ? ) ,我會更樂意在更新瓦特/一個連接到英語電影盡快,因為它的準備,並更新檢討瓦特/下一版本的liquifile以及。
I’m sick of 1990’s style file browsers period.我生病的1990年的作風建設的文件瀏覽器的時期。 Cramming in more buttons or designing a really slick looking interface are just not going to cut it.填鴨式在更多按鈕或設計一個真正的光滑尋找接口,只是不打算削減。 What we need is a radically different approach to file management.我們需要的是一種從根本上不同的方法來的檔案管理。 What I would like to see is something like我想看到的是,一些想 http://creativebits.org/mac_os_x/desk_-_rethinking_the_finder
or a more mature implementation of或更成熟的實施 http://blacktree.com/apps/deviant/index.html Basically, what I want is a desktop that IS the finder.基本上,我想是一個桌面,這是查找。 When I click on a folder on the desktop, I want the desktop itself to reveal the contents of the folder.當我點擊一個文件夾在桌面上,我想在桌面上本身揭示了該文件夾的內容。 The ability to open a separate finder window could be retained, but basically I want to do all of my file management right in the desktop.能力打開一個單獨的Finder窗口,可以予以保留,但基本上,我不想做我所有的檔案的管理權在桌面上。
@Niklas: thats not totally correct. @尼古拉斯:這就是不完全正確的。 there are many LiquidBrowsing types.有很多liquidbrowsing類型。 some for mobile and some for other application areas.一些移動和一些其他的應用領域。 Liquifile is one of the normal ones…well…and it’s not running on a mobile device, does it? liquifile是一個正常的… …以及和它的不上運行的移動設備,不是嗎?
(well…let’s better say not YET ;-). (以及…讓我們更好地說,尚未;-) 。 well, Liquifile is implemented in native ObjectiveC.那麼, liquifile是落實在本土objectivec 。 there is no pressure sensitive device running OSX yet (sadly).有沒有壓力敏感的裝置運行OSX上,但(可悲) 。
Have a look at有一個看看 Backdrop Folders背景資料夾 ! !
With Backdrop Folders, you can open “views” of your folders at the desktop level and interact with them.與背景的文件夾,您可以打開的“意見”您的文件夾在桌面上的水平和互動,與他們。
These views remain visible when you reveal the desktop with Exposé, which allows you to pick a file or to do a drag and drop operation in no time, without the hassle of having to switch to the Finder and navigate through your disk hierarchy.這些意見,保持可見當您揭示桌面與Exposé的,它可以讓您選擇一個文件或做拖放操作在任何時候,沒有麻煩後,切換到Finder和瀏覽您的磁盤層次。
Backdrop folders is definitely a step in the right direction.背景資料夾絕對是一個正確方向邁出的一步。 But i want something like icon view on the desktop.但我想的東西一樣,圖標的看法在桌面上。 Backdrop folders is like contextual menus on steroids, but what i want is a “finder” that is indistinguishable from the desktop.背景資料夾,就像上下文菜單類固醇,但我想說的是一個“查找” ,也就是區分從桌面上。 Thanks for the tip though!感謝尖端雖然!
One of the things I don’t like about the current finder is that you can’t view id3 tag information right in the list view.其中一件事我不喜歡對當前查找的是,您無法查看的ID3標記信息的權利,在名單上的看法。 Which of these Finder alternatives offers views of id3 tags for mp3s?而這些查找替代品提供的意見, ID3標籤為MP3音樂呢?
Sadly, the FileRun web site seems to have gone severely “minimalist” in the last few days.可悲的是, filerun網站似乎已經歷了嚴重的“最低限度”在過去數天。 There’s nothing left at沒有什麼留在 http://filerun.info/ or或 http://filerun.de except one tantalising icon.除一抗拒圖標。
Looks like RIP, I’m afraid…看起來像食價,我恐怕…
Dave戴夫
Dave -戴夫-
Noooo!!! noooo !
You’re right.您的權利。 Damn.譴責。 Well hey - lets be optimistic and instead of thinking it’s RIP, we’ll think it’s “teasing us just before the launch”.以及嗨-讓樂觀,而不是思想,它的食價,我們將認為這是“取笑我們剛才前推出” 。
The review of XFile is far from unfair.審查xfile是遠遠不公平的。 $79 is ridiculously over-priced. 79元是可笑的超額定價。 When all your competition doesn’t even approach your price, your app is over-priced.當您的所有競爭,甚至沒有辦法,您的價格,您的應用程序,是過度的價格。 Regardless of what YOU as the developer feel it’s worth.不論是什麼,你作為開發商覺得值得一提的。
Even the $49.95 price for Path Finder is over-priced.甚至49.95美元的價格路徑查找,是過度的價格。
I would like to know what other two you kept.我想知道有什麼其他兩個你保留。
Maybe it’s time for someone to start a Finder Replacement GNU SourceForge project?也許它的時間,有人開始查找替換的GNU SourceForge專案?
@Dave: I’ve used, and own Path Finder, but the entire concept of user interface has to be re-thought. @戴夫:我用過,和自己的路查找,但整個概念的用戶界面已必須重新思考。 It is not as simply as a Path Finder replacement, rather, it might amount to an entire OS replacement.這不是簡單作為一個路徑查找替換,相反,它可能會構成整個操作系統的更換。 Nonetheless, neither Finder nor Path Finder adequate.然而,無論是查找,也沒有足夠的路徑查找。 Unfortunate, although I study CS, OS design is not my specialty and I plan getting my PhD in the ‘overcrowded’ field of Classics.不幸的,雖然我研究政務司司長, OS的設計是不是我的專業和我計劃獲得博士學位,在我的'擠迫'領域的經典之作。
This topic does need to be addressed further, user interface in any operating system.這個題目是否需要加以解決,進一步,用戶界面,在任何作業系統。 Neither OS X nor Vista (ack) is approaching acceptable–although, OS X, coming from an retired Windows XP user and linux user, is much better but no panacea.既不是OS X的也不是Vista的( ACK數據)是接近可接受雖然, OS X的,來自一個退休的Windows XP用戶和Linux用戶,是好得多,但沒有靈丹妙藥。
Yes, I will buy Leopard.好的,我會買豹。
It is impossible not to make a grammar or spelling error while posting!這是不可能不作語法或拼寫錯誤,而張貼!
Please do tell, though, what were the other 2 Finder ‘replacements’ you kept.請不要告訴,雖然,有什麼其他2查找'替代'你保留。
Sorry about being redundant, but I am curious.遺憾是多餘的,但我很好奇。
I wonder what error I made in this post?我不知道什麼錯誤,我在這個職位呢?
This is one super duper site這是一個超級duper網站
Hi there, I must say that you have done a wonderful job on your site and I thoroughly enjoyed my stay here, I thank you for sharing it with me…喜在那裡,我必須說,你所做的出色在您的網站上,我徹底享受我在這裡呆,我感謝你分享它跟我…
You have a great website.你有一個偉大的網站。 Keep up the good work.保持了良好的工作。
I found a new one called Forklift.我發現一個新的所謂的叉車。
There are some screeshots at也有一些在screeshots http://www.binarynights.com
Is there anyway to get a hold of the demo to Xfile?反正是有得到舉行的演示xfile ? Want a small replacement.希望有一個小更換。 This seems perfect!這似乎是完美的! Even a very old version would be great!即使是一種非常古老的版本將極了!
please send demo of xfile or acp to請發送演示xfile或機場核心計劃,以 somenkeps@hotmail.com
Xfile $79? xfile 79元呢? You read well.您閱讀。 The ACP costs $79 and that’s 50+ Cocoa apps and another 30 command line progs and a text and web services prog.機場核心計劃的成本79元和50 +可可應用服務,另有30的命令行progs和一個文本和Web服務的程式。 Xfile is only one program. xfile只有一個計劃。 It’s also available in a smaller package.它也可在一個較小的方案。 ftp://rixstep.com/pub/Xfile.tar.bz2 ftp://rixstep.com/pub/xfile.tar.bz2
Xfolders has good unified look but perhaps carried too far. xfolders具有良好的統一的期待,但也許進行太遠。 As for functionality it’s totally lame.至於功能,它的完全跛腳。
Xfile is way overpriced, whether for its stand-alone or “package” versions. xfile 是過高的方式,無論是它的立場-單獨或“一攬子”的版本。 Besides that, it’s supported only by a single and often rude developer (check his “Fairly” posting above).此外,它的支持,只有一個單一的,而且往往粗魯的開發商(檢查他的“公平”的張貼以上) 。 Try Pathfinder (and I don’t work for them), or one of the other alternatives.嘗試探路者(和我不為他們工作) ,或其中的其他辦法。 While Xfile is fast, no amount of speed helps with essentially fly-by-night ops.而xfile是速度快,任何數量的速度,有助於基本上粉煤灰由夜間的老年退休金計劃。
Fairly -公平-
At the time I wrote this (October 8th, 2006) there was absolutely no info on the Xfile web site that stated otherwise.在當時的我寫的這個( 2006年10月8日)有絕對沒有信息就xfile網站聲明,否則。 If you are in fact the Xfile developer then I commend you on hugely fixing/updating your site.如果您是在事實上, xfile開發的話,我讚揚你巨大的固定/更新您的網站。 I assure you, there was NO info on rixstep.com other than the 3 screenshots I borrowed, and a “buy it now” link.我向你保證,沒有信息就rixstep.com以外的其他3畫面我借來,並“立即購買”鏈接。 And nowhere did it say anything about a $45 version that didn’t include the entire ACP.和無處沒有說任何話約45元的版本,並不包括整個機場核心計劃。 Now that I can try it, I’ll give it a download and update the review accordingly.現在我可以嘗試它,我就會給它一個下載和更新檢討。 Cheers,乾杯,
Ross羅斯
I second the suggestion to have ForkLift included.我支持的建議,有叉車包括在內。
I read about this one a while back and it looks very promising.我看了有關此一回,而它看起來非常有前途。
Features (as per their site): Dual pane view, preview info/view, ftp, Zip, GZip, Tar, Rar integration.特點( %其網站) :雙窗格視圖,預覽信息/認為,的FTP ,郵遞區號, gzip ,焦油,一體化的RAR 。
$29.95, 15-day demo, 29.95美元,為期15天的演示, http://www.binarynights.com
it is at version 1.0.1 (6/2007).這是在版本1.0.1 ( 6 / 2007 ) 。
I will be giving it a look-see.我會賦予它的外觀看到的。
For some reason this post seems to attract more comment spam than any other on simplehelp.出於某種原因,似乎這個職位,以吸引更多的評論垃圾郵件比任何其他關於simplehelp 。 So I’m disabling comments to to avoid the hassle of having to review possible comment spam.因此,我禁用的意見,以避免麻煩後,檢討可能的垃圾評論。 If you have something you’d really like to add to this discussion, by all means please use the如果您有您想要的東西真的很喜歡添加到這次討論中,一切手段,請使用 Contact Form聯繫表格 and I’ll manually add your comment.我將手動添加您的評論。 Cheers!乾杯!
Ross羅斯
Comments on this entry are closed.評論關於這個項目均停課。