<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 15 Windows Explorer alternatives compared and reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/</link>
	<description>Common questions, simple answers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:40:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-24554</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-24554</guid>
		<description>HELP !!!

I&#039;ve read and tried several programs, but just can&#039;t find one that replaces &quot;powerdesk&quot;, which I have used for years.  The problem is, that powerdesk can be slower than molasses, especially on folders containing more than 1,000 files.  

One of the BIG things I like about powerdesk, is their launch bar, where you can easily put an icon for any executable file.

So my question is, I am looking for a filemanagement program that does some of the following things.  

1.  display 1,000&#039;s of files in a folder  INSTANTLY.  
2.  has a launch bar for executable files.
3. doesn&#039;t have 15 million different settings to go through if I want to set the program up... a very good example being Directory Opus 9.  I have installed that program, and it does #1 and #2 very good.... BUT, every damn time i go from one folder to another, the tabs change around, and show tabs i don&#039;t want.  I have changed settings in that program until I am now starting to HATE IT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HELP !!!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read and tried several programs, but just can&#8217;t find one that replaces &#8220;powerdesk&#8221;, which I have used for years.  The problem is, that powerdesk can be slower than molasses, especially on folders containing more than 1,000 files.  </p>
<p>One of the BIG things I like about powerdesk, is their launch bar, where you can easily put an icon for any executable file.</p>
<p>So my question is, I am looking for a filemanagement program that does some of the following things.  </p>
<p>1.  display 1,000&#8217;s of files in a folder  INSTANTLY.<br />
2.  has a launch bar for executable files.<br />
3. doesn&#8217;t have 15 million different settings to go through if I want to set the program up&#8230; a very good example being Directory Opus 9.  I have installed that program, and it does #1 and #2 very good&#8230;. BUT, every damn time i go from one folder to another, the tabs change around, and show tabs i don&#8217;t want.  I have changed settings in that program until I am now starting to HATE IT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wiz</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-23175</link>
		<dc:creator>wiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-23175</guid>
		<description>You can add Ultra Explorer to your list.
It is free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can add Ultra Explorer to your list.<br />
It is free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tux.</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-11899</link>
		<dc:creator>tux.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-11899</guid>
		<description>Basically, the major con of DOpus is the price. I really loved it during the trial period, but it&#039;s just that it is expensive AND it doesn&#039;t even have a lifetime license then...

For now, I&#039;ll switch between CubicExplorer and xplorer² (made them default for folders for a time)... both are great. The first is easier to use, the second is faster than Total Commander regarding any operation. Worth its price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, the major con of DOpus is the price. I really loved it during the trial period, but it&#8217;s just that it is expensive AND it doesn&#8217;t even have a lifetime license then&#8230;</p>
<p>For now, I&#8217;ll switch between CubicExplorer and xplorer² (made them default for folders for a time)&#8230; both are great. The first is easier to use, the second is faster than Total Commander regarding any operation. Worth its price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L.A.G.M.</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-2529</link>
		<dc:creator>L.A.G.M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 00:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-2529</guid>
		<description>For me the best is EF Commander. Try it at www.efsoftware.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me the best is EF Commander. Try it at <a href="http://www.efsoftware.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.efsoftware.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yiorgos</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-2519</link>
		<dc:creator>Yiorgos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-2519</guid>
		<description>Very useful presentation and nice discussion too! Thanks to all of you.

One of my basic needs that Windows Explorer doesn&#039;t meet, is to print file lists, some of them very long. Besides that scrappy Alt+PrtScn, any method I have found on the web  did not work right for me (for various reasons). There are some commercial utilities for the job but they usually cost the price of a good alternative to the Windows Explorer, so I looked if I could have an &quot;all in one&quot; package. But I found no mention about this possibility (or the lack of it) here and I &#039;m really surprised since I thought it would be a very common need. If anyone knows about it, please tell me (us).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful presentation and nice discussion too! Thanks to all of you.</p>
<p>One of my basic needs that Windows Explorer doesn&#8217;t meet, is to print file lists, some of them very long. Besides that scrappy Alt+PrtScn, any method I have found on the web  did not work right for me (for various reasons). There are some commercial utilities for the job but they usually cost the price of a good alternative to the Windows Explorer, so I looked if I could have an &#8220;all in one&#8221; package. But I found no mention about this possibility (or the lack of it) here and I &#8216;m really surprised since I thought it would be a very common need. If anyone knows about it, please tell me (us).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-2520</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-2520</guid>
		<description>Nice info. I&#039;m interested in browsing through network files, from computers half word away - the company I work for has offices in Brazil, UK and US, and is very common to dig through files in the UK from Brazil, for example. So the huge lag of windows explorer, if it doesn&#039;t blocks the whole OS, is almost unfeasible. I tested total commander, ultraexplorer for network file browser and they are quite disapointing. Total Commander is even slower than windows explorer when accessing big directory structures - I guess it tries to read each folder details. UltraExplorer also presents a similar behaviour and halts as much as windows explorer. I found good results using Salamander and even better results using FAR. Salamander still presents delays but for sure is less than explorer, whilst this delay is minimum using FAR. Of course a delay will aways occur since the files are remote, but I&#039;m comparing with the results I get when using a command prompt in mapped drives. For now, when I need to browse remote folders, for sure I&#039;m using FAR Manager..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice info. I&#8217;m interested in browsing through network files, from computers half word away &#8211; the company I work for has offices in Brazil, UK and US, and is very common to dig through files in the UK from Brazil, for example. So the huge lag of windows explorer, if it doesn&#8217;t blocks the whole OS, is almost unfeasible. I tested total commander, ultraexplorer for network file browser and they are quite disapointing. Total Commander is even slower than windows explorer when accessing big directory structures &#8211; I guess it tries to read each folder details. UltraExplorer also presents a similar behaviour and halts as much as windows explorer. I found good results using Salamander and even better results using FAR. Salamander still presents delays but for sure is less than explorer, whilst this delay is minimum using FAR. Of course a delay will aways occur since the files are remote, but I&#8217;m comparing with the results I get when using a command prompt in mapped drives. For now, when I need to browse remote folders, for sure I&#8217;m using FAR Manager..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-2518</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-2518</guid>
		<description>Some very handy info.  Explorer is so unbelievably slow for me, I&#039;m game to try some alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some very handy info.  Explorer is so unbelievably slow for me, I&#8217;m game to try some alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alternative la Windows Explorer</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-2517</link>
		<dc:creator>Alternative la Windows Explorer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-2517</guid>
		<description>[...] SimpleHelp.net a publicat o interesantă analiză a 15 alternative la Windows Explorer. Iată numele lor: A43, Ac Browser Plus, CubicExplorer, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SimpleHelp.net a publicat o interesantă analiză a 15 alternative la Windows Explorer. Iată numele lor: A43, Ac Browser Plus, CubicExplorer, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alternative File explorer &#171; royalcitrus</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-2515</link>
		<dc:creator>Alternative File explorer &#171; royalcitrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-2515</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/" rel="nofollow">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-2512</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-2512</guid>
		<description>XYplorer 8.00, the Dual Pane Edition, will be officially released on Monday, 15-June-2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XYplorer 8.00, the Dual Pane Edition, will be officially released on Monday, 15-June-2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-2516</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 06:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-2516</guid>
		<description>Hey,

Excellent excellent post.
To me it was important to find a portable one that has some accessibility features - such as font size and background color.
A43 is the one - thanks for mentioning the &quot;no installation&quot; bit.

Thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>Excellent excellent post.<br />
To me it was important to find a portable one that has some accessibility features &#8211; such as font size and background color.<br />
A43 is the one &#8211; thanks for mentioning the &#8220;no installation&#8221; bit.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charisti</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-2514</link>
		<dc:creator>charisti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-2514</guid>
		<description>i want to ad some info, xplorer doesn&#039;t show deleted files if you enable &quot;automatic refresh&quot; in preferences.

thanks for the review</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want to ad some info, xplorer doesn&#8217;t show deleted files if you enable &#8220;automatic refresh&#8221; in preferences.</p>
<p>thanks for the review</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Total Commander Replacement &#171; PostIT</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-2513</link>
		<dc:creator>Total Commander Replacement &#171; PostIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 14:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-2513</guid>
		<description>[...] SimpleHelp.NET &#8211; 15 Windows Explorer alternatives compared and reviewed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SimpleHelp.NET &#8211; 15 Windows Explorer alternatives compared and reviewed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-2511</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 12:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-2511</guid>
		<description>power desk pro is rubbish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>power desk pro is rubbish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best Windows Explorer replacement? &#124; keyongtech</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/comment-page-4/#comment-2510</link>
		<dc:creator>Best Windows Explorer replacement? &#124; keyongtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/#comment-2510</guid>
		<description>[...] Best Windows Explorer replacement?   Check this page: http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11...-and-reviewed/  and this one:  http://www.simplehelp.net/2007/07/19...-and-reviewed/    Will wrote: &gt; I like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Best Windows Explorer replacement?   Check this page: <a href="http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11...-and-reviewed/" rel="nofollow">http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11&#8230;-and-reviewed/</a>  and this one:  <a href="http://www.simplehelp.net/2007/07/19...-and-reviewed/" rel="nofollow">http://www.simplehelp.net/2007/07/19&#8230;-and-reviewed/</a>    Will wrote: &gt; I like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
