I was recently approached by someone who wanted to buy $550 worth of advertising on Simplehelp, and ended out turning them down.最近我接觸的人誰想買價值550美元的廣告Simplehelp ,並結束了轉折點他們失望。 After seeking the advice of a number of other bloggers, here’s why I said no.經過徵求意見,其他一些博客,這裡就是為什麼我說沒有。
This post could also be called “Why I still don’t have an iPhone”.這個職位也被稱為“為什麼我仍然不具備iPhone手機” 。
The entire email transcript between “James” and I can be found as a screenshot at the end of this post.整個之間的電子郵件記錄“詹姆斯, ”我可以找到一個畫面結束時,這一職務。 The only info that I Photoshopped (唯一的信息,我Photoshopped ( Gimp’ed Gimp'ed really) out of the email is James’s last name and email address.真的)的電子郵件是詹姆斯的最後名稱和電子郵件地址。
So - on Sept 12th I received an email from James, asking if I was interested in selling him advertising on Simplehelp.所以-在9月1 2日我收到了電子郵件,詹姆斯,詢問我是否有意出售他的廣告S implehelp。 My response was sure I’m interested, what did you have in mind?我的回答是肯定我很感興趣,你怎麼想到的? He responded with a request to insert a paragraph on 8 different pages on Simplehelp, with his “links adjusted in them”.他回答,並要求插入一個段落, 8個不同的網頁Simplehelp ,他的“鏈接調整他們” 。 His next line was what made me actually consider his offer - he citied a “Technorati Top 100″ blog (SmashingMagazine) as an example of who has taken him up on this kind of offer, and a direct link to an example of this “style” of ad.他的下一行是什麼使我真正考慮他的提議-他c itied一個“ T echnorati的前1 00名”博客( S mashingMagazine)作為一個例子是誰,他已對這樣的提議,並直接鏈接到這方面的一個例子“風格“的廣告。 I subscribe to我贊成 SM’s RSS feed釤的RSS種子 , and I actually read it. ,我其實閱讀。 So if they’re doing this kind of advertising, it sure seems legit, right?所以,如果他們正在做這樣的廣告,它肯定是合法的,對不對?
The very smartest thing that I did in making my decision was to ask other bloggers what they thought.非常聰明的事情,我沒有使我的決定是要求其他博客他們思想。 So I sent an email to因此,我發送電子郵件至 Jason傑森 , , engtech , and ,並 The How-To Geek該如何對怪胎 . 。 Eng brought楊永強了 Daniel丹尼爾 into the discussion, as he had recently進入討論,因為他最近 wrote about a similar’ish scheme寫了similar'ish計劃 . 。 Here’s what I learned from those guys:以下是我從這些傢伙:
Quite a few bloggers have been recently approached with a similar offer.不少博客最近已接近了類似的建議。 In fact, two of the guys that were a part of my email thread had been approached by the same company - with offers higher than what I was being given.事實上,兩個傢伙有一部分我的電子郵件線程已接近同一家公司-以提供更高的比我正在考慮。 They both turned it down, for the same reason I was skeptical - it’s not worth the possibility of他們都拒絕了,出於同樣的原因,我持懷疑態度-這是不值得的可能性 being punished by Google受到懲罰的谷歌 . 。 And a lifetime contract was out of the question.和終身合同是不可能的。
I also emailed the folks @ SM asking if they were willing to talk about their experience with this ‘advertiser’.我還通過電子郵件的人@釤要求,如果他們願意談論他們的經驗,這個'廣告' 。 They actually answered my email very quickly, and said they were pleased with the agreement.他們實際上回答我的電子郵件非常快,並表示他們很高興的協議。
But as The Geek pointed out, SM can get away with it - I can’t.但是,隨著奇客指出,釤可以擺脫它-我不能。 They get so much traffic from other blogs, social sites like digg and del.icio.us, that they don’t “need” Google as badly as I do.他們得到這麼多來自其他交通博客,社交網站Digg和del.icio.us ,他們不“需要”谷歌作為急需像我一樣。 And since Google sends me almost自谷歌和我幾乎發出 half of my traffic上半年,我國交通 , I really can’t risk “ruining my reputation” with them if I want to think long-term. ,我真的無法風險“敗壞我的名譽”與他們如果我想要想長遠。
Side note: if you’re bored enough to read through the transcript below, you’ll notice that I actually kind of ‘played along’ with James, trying to get more details from him. 附註:如果你足夠無聊通讀全文如下,你會發現,其實我種'發揮沿'詹姆斯,試圖獲得更多的細節他。 Asking him if he was sure if this kind of thing was OK with Google (of course he said it was).問他,如果他相信,如果這種事情是確定與谷歌(當然,他說,這是) 。 When I mentioned I was skeptical of a lifetime commitment, he dropped it to 3 years (and increased the offer from $520 to $550).當我提到我是持懷疑態度一生的承諾,他把它丟至3年(並增加了提供從520美元到550美元) 。 When I finally flat out said I’d need to review the sites he wanted me to link to before I’d say yes, he stopped responding.當我終於平了說,我想需要審查的網站,他要我聯繫之前,我要說是的,他停止響應。 I haven’t heard from him since.我還沒有聽說,因為從他。























{ 2 trackbacks } ( 2 )搬場
{ 5 comments… read them below or ( 5意見...閱讀低於或 add one添加一個 } )
I’m not sure if it is the same group or idea but in the past little while I’ve been getting emails from a woman with a GMail addie asking if I would be interested in some text link advertising or sponsored posts advertising.我不知道這是同一組或想法,但在過去的很少,而我已經獲得的電子郵件從一個女人與Gmail員詢問我是否有興趣在一些文本鏈接廣告或廣告贊助的職位。
The fact that there was no “company name” associated with the email sent up warning flags for me.事實上,沒有任何“公司名稱”相關的電子郵件發出警告旗幟我。 Needless to say the emails found their way into the trash.不用說電子郵件發現自己進入了垃圾箱。
I’m glad that you resisted an offer like that and SmashingMagazine is added to my do not bother to read list我很高興,你拒絕要約一樣,和SmashingMagazine添加到我不打擾閱讀清單
@Steven: I wouldn’t go so far as to stop reading SmashingMagazine because of their advertising choices - they do have some good content sometimes. @史蒂芬:我想還不至於停止閱讀SmashingMagazine ,因為他們的廣告選擇-他們確實有一些很好的內容有時。
Agreeing to give up a permanent spot on your page is just crazy, though.同意放棄永久位置上的網頁是瘋了,但。
I had the same thing - “James” offering $150.00 for infinite years for unspecified text pointing to spammy sites.我有同樣的事情-“詹姆斯”提供$ 1 50.00為無限年不詳文指著垃圾網站。
I said no; he came back with $250.00 for the same thing.我說沒有,他回來與$ 250.00為同樣的事情。
For crying out loud, I can get that much a year for non-spam, one and two word text links - why on earth would I give him paragraphs pointing to spam _forever_ for a third of the price?對於哭出來,我可以把一年多的非垃圾郵件,第一和第二字文字鏈接-為什麼地球上,我會請他指著第_ forever_垃圾的三分之一的價格? I told him that, and he came back with $300 for 3 years我告訴他,他回來與300美元3年
He was a persistent bugger, I’ll give him that.他是一個持續的雞姦,我會給他說。
I too had got a similar offer but instead of James it was some one called Jennifer, though the amount she offered me was a bit higher than yours she to finally agreed to come down from lifetime to 5 years.我也已經獲得了類似的提議,而是詹姆斯這是某些人所謂的珍妮弗,但她的數額給我有點比你高,她終於同意下來的壽命為5年。
Like you I too rejected the ads和你一樣我也拒絕廣告
@ The How-To Geek該如何對怪胎 : :
I agree - I’m not going to stop reading them, the ads don’t take away from the content (imo) - they couldn’t be more clearly labeled as such.我同意-我不會停止閱讀,廣告不採取遠離的內容(海事組織) -他們不能有更明確的標示等。
btw this response was crafted w/ that greasemonkey script I mentioned生物及毒素武器這一反應是製作瓦特/的Greasemonkey腳本是我提到
Leave a Comment發表您的評論