<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to use dstat to monitor your Linux/UNIX server</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplehelp.net/2008/11/13/how-to-use-dstat-to-monitor-your-linuxunix-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2008/11/13/how-to-use-dstat-to-monitor-your-linuxunix-server/</link>
	<description>Common questions, simple answers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:28:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: oberförster</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2008/11/13/how-to-use-dstat-to-monitor-your-linuxunix-server/comment-page-1/#comment-9813</link>
		<dc:creator>oberförster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/?p=1637#comment-9813</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just found a little discrepancy between dstat and dd regarding the I/O:

ifx@ids:/opt/informix/devices$ dd if=file_20GB of=/dev/null bs=2048 count=10000000
10000000+0 Datensätze ein
10000000+0 Datensätze aus
20480000000 Bytes (20 GB) kopiert, 261,738 s, 78,2 MB/s


A shell running dstat at the same time showed me:

-dsk/total----dsk/hdc-----dsk/hdd--
 read  writ: read  writ: read  writ
 140M  104k:  62M   24k:7960k   28k
 150M    0 :  64M    0 :  12M    0
 160M    0 :   0     0 :  80M    0
 154M    0 :  43M    0 :  34M    0
 150M    0 :  75M    0 :   0     0
 153M   56k:8384k   20k:  68M 8192B

So it looks like we all should use dstat if we want to impress people with big numbers.

 Looks also like you shouldn&#039;t compare dstat to something else than dstat if you really want to compare systems, I doubt I&#039;ll use it any more for this kind of stuff any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just found a little discrepancy between dstat and dd regarding the I/O:</p>
<p>ifx@ids:/opt/informix/devices$ dd if=file_20GB of=/dev/null bs=2048 count=10000000<br />
10000000+0 Datensätze ein<br />
10000000+0 Datensätze aus<br />
20480000000 Bytes (20 GB) kopiert, 261,738 s, 78,2 MB/s</p>
<p>A shell running dstat at the same time showed me:</p>
<p>-dsk/total&#8212;-dsk/hdc&#8212;&#8211;dsk/hdd&#8211;<br />
 read  writ: read  writ: read  writ<br />
 140M  104k:  62M   24k:7960k   28k<br />
 150M    0 :  64M    0 :  12M    0<br />
 160M    0 :   0     0 :  80M    0<br />
 154M    0 :  43M    0 :  34M    0<br />
 150M    0 :  75M    0 :   0     0<br />
 153M   56k:8384k   20k:  68M 8192B</p>
<p>So it looks like we all should use dstat if we want to impress people with big numbers.</p>
<p> Looks also like you shouldn&#8217;t compare dstat to something else than dstat if you really want to compare systems, I doubt I&#8217;ll use it any more for this kind of stuff any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perfector</title>
		<link>http://www.simplehelp.net/2008/11/13/how-to-use-dstat-to-monitor-your-linuxunix-server/comment-page-1/#comment-9812</link>
		<dc:creator>perfector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplehelp.net/?p=1637#comment-9812</guid>
		<description>Nice article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
