Love it or hate it, Finder is the default file manager for OS X. But there are other choices out there, and this article offers reviews, screenshots and links to download 10 different alternatives.
Did I miss your favorite file manager in this list? By all means please feel free to leave a comment below and I’ll update this list (come on – the windows commenters have suggested a lot!)
| Name | Cost (USD) | Demo version available | Universal Binary | Stars (out of 5) | Detailed review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Path Finder | $34.95 | yes (21 days) | yes | ***½ | here |
| Disk Order | $22.57 | yes (30 days) | yes | *** | here |
| FileBrowse | $25.00 | yes (30 days) | yes | **** | here |
| FileRun | $??.?? | no | unknown | n/a | here |
| 3DOSX | free | n/a | no | ** | here |
| RAGE Macintosh Explorer | $15.95 | yes | not yet, but works w/ Rosetta | **½ | here |
| Xfolders | free | n/a | yes | **** | here |
| muCommander | free | n/a | no | **** | here |
| Liquifile | $9.90 | yes (30 days) | yes | **½ | here |
| Xfile | $79.00 | no | no | * | here |
Requirements: Version 4.5 requires Mac OS X 10.4 or higher, there is an older version available for 10.3 and 10.2, however that version will no longer be updated.
Download URL: http://www.cocoatech.com/download.php
Features in a nutshell:
New Features:
Thoughts:
Path Finder is by far the most “popular” alternative to Finder for OS X. It has many, many features that you won’t find in Finder (top of the list would be tabs, desktop icon changes and the ‘drop stack’). The Path Finder menu item/button is also a helpful feature (see image below).
It uses more system resources than most of the other File Managers outlined in this article, and isn’t above the occasional crash. It does share the same “3 view” option as Finder (list, columns, icons), but the addition of tabs helps make for a far less cluttered desktop.
Being the 2nd most expensive File Manager reviewed, it’s a good thing that there’s a 21 day fully-functional demo available.
Screenshots:
![]() lots of commands |
![]() column view with tabs |
![]() Path Finder menu icon |
![]() new desktop ‘right-click’ menu |
![]() Path Finder prefs |
![]() more Path finder prefs |
![]() changed desktop icons |
Requirements: OSX 10.3 and higher, there is an older version for 10.2 that won’t be updated and has fewer features
Download URL: http://www.likemac.ru/english/download.shtml
Features in a nutshell:
Thoughts:
Disk Order is pretty nice. The built in FTP client is helpful, the built-in preview works well and mix of Mac native and Norton-Commander styles blend really well. Its biggest drawback is that Xfolders is very similar, but free.
Screenshots:
![]() Disk Order default view |
![]() Disk Order with FTP |
![]() Disk Order prefs |
![]() Disk Order nag screen |
![]() Disk Order Extras |
![]() Disk Order Commands |
![]() Disk Order (running a command) |
Requirements: Mac OS X 10.4.0 and later
Download URL: http://www.filebrowse.com/download.html
Features in a nutshell:
Thoughts:
FileBrowse strikes me as a ‘love it or hate it’ File Manager. It’s quite different than the others in this list, as it has far fewer features. But… what it lacks in features, it makes up for by perfecting the the existing ones. Plus, at the (early) version of 1.0.2, who knows what the future may have in store.
Arguably the best ‘feature’ of FileBrowse is its unique, minimalist but elegant interface. FileBrowse can show thumbnails for many file types, not only for images. And folder icons even show the items inside, so you don’t have to open a folder to see its contents. Keyboard navigation within FileBrowse takes some getting used to. Previewing images at different sizes is a snap, and previewing multimedia (music, movies) is just as easy. Give it a try, but don’t blame me if you don’t like it.
Screenshots:
![]() FileBrowse is pretty |
![]() FileBrowse is pretty 2 |
![]() view the contents of folders |
![]() huge preview |
![]() play, preview or open media |
Requirements: who knows, it’s not out yet
Download URL: n/a – but the home page is: http://www.filerun.info/
Features in a nutshell:
Thoughts:
I really only included this one because I’ve been watching this website for updates since Jan of 2006. It was supposed to be available for download in Feb of 2006, and still isn’t. It’s a shame, because it looks like it could be really great.
Screenshots:
![]() FileRun – doesn’t exist, but looks pretty |
![]() FileRun |
![]() FileRun again |
![]() FileRun LastOne |
Requirements: Mac OS X 10.1 or higher, and an OpenGL hardware accelerated video card (supporting OpenGL 1.2 or higher)
Download URL: http://www.acm.uiuc.edu/macwarriors/projects/oldprojects/3dosx/download.html
Features in a nutshell:
Thoughts:
Barely worked for me. A neat concept that was either very poorly executed, or not at all intended for a MacBook Pro and/or Tiger. It reminded me a bit of Sphere, but I used Sphere for at least an hour longer than I did 3DOSX.
Screenshots:
![]() 3DOSX is a neat concept |
![]() Too bad it doesn’t really work (for me) |
![]() 3DOSX prefs |
![]() 3DOSX apps view |
Requirements: OS X, OS 9
Download URL: http://www.ragesw.com/products/explorer/download/
Features in a nutshell:
Thoughts:
As the name suggests, Macintosh Explorer is what might happen if Finder and Windows Explorer had an ugly child. OK not ugly, but not very exciting either. At least it has tabs. It responded quite slowly compared to the other File Managers.
The Filter drawer was the best feature I found. It allows you to create and save filters so with one click you can find the files you’re looking for in a given folder.
Screenshots:
![]() Default Macintosh Explorer with preview |
![]() Default Macintosh Explorer |
![]() Macintosh Explorer prefs |
![]() Macintosh Explorer File list |
![]() Macintosh Explorer Filter drawer |
![]() Macintosh Explorer File Info |
Requirements: Apple PowerPC or Intel based Mac with Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger
Download URL: http://www.kai-heitkamp.de/cms_en/main.php?content…
Features in a nutshell:
Thoughts:
Xfolders is one of the three reviewed File Managers that I haven’t yet removed from my Mac. It’s very easy to navigate using just the Keyboard, and all mouse actions are exactly as you’d expect. If you’re a fan of the Norton Commander style of File Manager, you’ll appreciate the Xfolders layout (though maybe not as much as muCommander).
Compared to all of the other File Managers, Xfolders uses a very small amount of system resources. The ability to completely customize the Toolbar is a nice bonus.
Screenshots:
![]() Default Xfolders view |
![]() Xfolders Spotlight add-on |
![]() customize Xfolders toolbar |
![]() Xfolders new folder |
![]() Xfolders prefs |
Requirements: Mac OS X 10.1 and up
Download URL: http://www.mucommander.com/#download
Features in a nutshell:
Thoughts:
muCommander is a Norton Commander-lovers dream come true for OS X. Also, being cross-platform, you can use this File Manager on multiple OS’s (if you’re that kind of person). Supporting FTP, SFTP and HTTP is great (HTTP is a very neat feature). Smallest system resource footprint of all the tested File Managers.
Screenshots:
![]() Default muCommander view |
![]() Use muCommander to download files via http |
![]() muCommander prefs |
![]() run a command |
![]() muCommander FTP/SFTP etc setup |
Requirements: OS 10.4 or higher
Download URL: http://www.liquefile.com/ (then click the download link)
Features in a nutshell:
Even the folks at liquifile.com seem to have trouble explaining their product. They suggest you watch this video (in German) to understand its features. Liquifile is based on some concepts and technologies (like liquid browsing or the scatter tree) that originate from the “iworld” or “infoverse” project.
Thoughts:
It’s neat. I guess. I won’t be using it any time soon, but I suppose there are folks out there who might adore this File Manager. Give it a try, it’s unique at least.
Screenshots:
![]() use the far right slider to adjust size |
![]() some file options |
![]() bubble size and location matters |
![]() folder view |
![]() Liquifile prefs |
Requirements: OS X, I think.
Download URL: http://rixstep.com/4/0/buy/index.shtml
Features in a nutshell:
Thoughts:
Seriously, $79 for a single license and there’s no demo/trial? We’re supposed to decide if we want to buy this software based on just three screenshots? Get real. I’m not sure that it deserves even one star, but I like the idea of a 40 KB executable.
Screenshots:
![]() Xfile looks pretty nice |
![]() uh ok |
![]() delete stuff |



















































Pingback: 10 OS X Finder alternatives compared and reviewed « How good is this?
Pingback: Switchblog » Blog Archive » Find a Finder replacement
Pingback: Rogi: The Weblog
Pingback: twist of fait accomplis
Pingback: The.RSS.Reporter
Pingback: EveryDigg » Blog Archive » 10 OS X Finder alternatives compared and reviewed
Pingback: 43f Links for Tuesday, October 10th | 43 Folders
Pingback: Some helpful Mac applications at jasonglaspey.com
Pingback: Life, it is a Travesty… » links for 2006-10-10
Pingback: quatzacoalt|dot|com / blog » Blog Archive » Del.icio.us links for 12/10/06
Pingback: Alternativen zum Finder? - Seite 3 - Apfeltalk
Pingback: ..::MacWarez::.. - Alternativas al Finder
Pingback: pl0g-kafe-roundup 061017 at pl0g.de
Pingback: Wangtam
Pingback: Jason’s Random Tech News » 10 OS X Finder alternatives compared and reviewed
Pingback: The Digg Effect - Search for Diggs or get Dugg » 10 OS X Finder alternatives compared and reviewed
Pingback: muCommand and other complements to Apple Finder « fuzzybrain|daisychain|blogdrain
Pingback: PathFinder 4.8 « APNIBI blog
Pingback: » 10 alternativas a Finder Blogfeed Actualización diario de contenidos
Pingback: IT Launchpad » Blog Archive » Open Network Shares Faster with Mac Finder - Apps, Gadgets, and Tips for UUA Staff
Pingback: 10 alternativas al Finder de MacOS X | TecnoApps.net
Pingback: Alternativas a Cuevana » Archive » 10 alternativas al Finder de MacOS X | TecnoApps.net